January 18, 2011
Balancing Viewpoints on the Balance of Payments
By Cindy Ivanac-Lillig
The Balance of Payments (BOP) is the sum of all the international transactions a country makes. The BOP basically consists of:
• The current account -- the sum of the trade account (exports minus imports), net factor income (payments to residents minus payments to foreigners from investments and remittances) and net transfer payments (foreign aid).
• The capital account (sometimes referred to as the financial account) -- the sum of international investments, loans, and government transactions.
In the field of economics, we hear more about the current account than the capital account. I think this is because it is partially included in the GDP formula, which all economists know and love. The trade account (NX), is a subset of the current account and it is included in our GDP formula (Y=G+I+C+NX).
So, I bet everyone reading probably knows that the U.S. runs a trade deficit (large part of current account), but how many of us stop and think that this means we must be running a capital account surplus. After all, the BOP is an identity, so one account must offset the other. What does running a capital surplus mean? This means lots of people buy American assets, and we can thus use this capital to invest or consume. Realizing this helps to explain why it’s just too simplistic to theorize that if we were to export more goods and services, more jobs would be created. If our net exports were to improve, it would follow that our capital account surplus would diminish and that would somewhat offset our ability to consume and invest. The distribution of employment would probably shift, but the idea that there would be more jobs overall is not entirely clear.
The current and financial accounts are interesting in and of themselves, but the dynamic between the two is much more interesting.
There is a lot of talk in the press and blogosphere about China's currency revaluation and how that relates to the U.S. economy and our trade deficit (part of the current account). Instead of looking at the trade account, it may be interesting for your classes to look at China's capital account and how the liberalization of that will affect the U.S. economy. It is really unique opportunity to look at one of the fastest-growing economies (China) versus one of the most developed (U.S.) through this new lens.
Let me know what you think?
Posted by Cindy at January 18, 2011 4:47 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Very nice post, good luck! ;-)
Posted by: canadian pharmacy at February 15, 2011 5:05 PM
Good points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t comment to blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault in the least , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading the content .
Posted by: tui xach hang hieu at April 19, 2011 10:23 AM
A lot of what you state happens to be supprisingly precise and that makes me ponder why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. Your piece truly did switch the light on for me as far as this issue goes. Nevertheless there is actually one particular point I am not necessarily too cozy with and whilst I try to reconcile that with the main theme of your issue, allow me see exactly what all the rest of the readers have to point out.Well done.
Posted by: Peter at May 11, 2011 8:38 PM
I located your link and think it really full of useful info. Your posts are clear, to the point and straight forward. I'm going to read more of your blog. Look forward to more!
Posted by: Ilda Mazowieski at August 24, 2011 7:52 PM
A very informative film that helps me understand how complex the world financial landscape has become.
Posted by: Kieth Bocker at October 3, 2011 2:32 AM
I am speechless. This is a gripping blog and very engaging too. Nice work! Thats not really much coming from an amateur publisher like me, but its all I could think after viewing your posts. Great grammar and vocabulary. Unlike other blogs. You really know what youre talking about too. So much that you made me want to learn more. Your blog has become a stepping stone for me, my fellow blogger. Thank you for the articulate journey. I really enjoyed the 8 posts that I have read so far.
Posted by: dmmaseoseoseoseo at December 22, 2011 1:23 AM
Hi there! I simply wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the great info you have gotten here on this post. I will likely be coming again to your weblog for more soon.
Posted by: Desmond Bishop Jersey at January 9, 2012 5:15 AM
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait ..
Posted by: Evelin Fongeallaz at March 9, 2012 10:52 AM
Getting to the the basis of a problamatic solution starts with looking for the the premise. That could seem confusing but a lot difficulties start from the premise, not the conclusion.
Posted by: Mikki Sukut at June 21, 2012 10:37 AM
Post a comment
All comments and links posted to FRBC blogs are reviewed. The Federal Reserve reserves the right to protect against spam, off-topic and profane comments and links; any such comments or links will be deleted and the domain address of the poster blocked.